Archive for 'Cases'

R v. Ted Gets | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Case Name:

R. v. Gets
Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Ted Gets
[2011] O.J. No. XXXX
Ontario Court of Justice
Toronto, Ontario
P.A.J. Harris J.
Oral judgment: June 2, 2011.
(16 paras.)
Counsel:

M. Mackett, Ms.: Counsel for the Crown.

T.K. Pain, Mr.: Counsel for Ted Gets.


 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 

1     P.A.J. HARRIS J. (orally):— This is my ruling on all of the charges facing Mr. Ted Gets, charged 29th of June, 2010, impaired operation, over 80 milligrams, class G2 licence with blood/alcohol greater than zero milligrams per cent, fail to ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. Dan Goderidge | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

V.

 

DAN GODERIDGE

 

EXCERPT OF  TRIAL PROCEEDINGS

 

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE XXXXXX

On November 18, 20XX

At Newmarket, Ontario

 

Appearances:

G. Sang            Counsel for the Crown

T. Pain                        Counsel for Dan Goderidge

 

 

Ms Sang:  Good afternoon again, Your Honour.  Thank you very much for the indulgence.

The Court:  Absolutely.

Ms Sang:  During my friend’s cross-examination of Ms Goderidge this afternoon it became very clear to me that there were a number of inconsistencies with Ms Goderidge’s own evidence at the trial and also between Ms ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. Tara Reid | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

R. v. Reid
Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Tara Reid
[2010] O.J. No. 2222
2010 ONCJ 189
Ontario Court of Justice
Toronto, Ontario
M. Green J.
Heard: April 15-16, 2010.
Judgment: May 13, 2010.
(39 paras.)
Criminal law Criminal Code offences — Offences against person and reputation — Motor vehicles — Impaired driving or driving over the legal limit — Roadside screening test — As soon as practicable or forthwith — Accused found not guilty of driving while over ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. N.B. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Court File No.

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
(GENERAL DIVISION)
(Toronto Region)

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent

–and–

NATHAN BALILALINGAM
Applicant

_____________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S FACTUM
_____________________________________________________

Part I – Statement of the Case

The Applicant, Nathan Balilalingam, was arrested and charged on February 18, 1997, together with Mr. Chris Paralingam (a young person within the meaning of the Young Offenders Act) with the offences of Point Firearm, Weapons Dangerous, Assault with a Weapon, and Utter Death Threats. On January 9, 1998, a preliminary inquiry was held and the Applicant ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. H.K. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Court File No.
ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.

HUGH KIRBY

**********

CONTINUED TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE F. ROSS
on the 16th day of January, 2007
at Toronto, Ontario

**********

Charges: Impaired Driving
Over 80

**********

APPEARANCE S:

R. COLLINS Counsel for the Crown
T. PAIN, ESQ. Counsel for the accused

**********

TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007
MR. COLLINS: Which brings us to the further evidence of Hugh Kirby.
Mr. Pain is here on that.
MR. PAIN: Good morning.
THE COURT: And is Mr. Kirby here?
Continue Reading →

0

R. v. Don Newman | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

 

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
v.
DON NEWMAN
**********
GUILTY PLEA PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE HONORABLE MADAM JUSTICE XXXX
On June XX, 20XX at TORONTO, Ontario
Courtroom XXX
********

APPEARANCES
J. North, Ms. Counsel for the Crown
T. Pain, Mr. Counsel for the Accused

THURSDAY, JUNE XX, 20XX
MS. NORTH: And the next matter I can deal with is Don Newman, number 19 and 20.
MR. PAIN: Good morning, Your Honour, my name is Pain: P-A-I-N, first initial ‘T’. Mr. ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. K.M. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Case Name:
R. v. Masters

Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Ken M. Masters

[2005] O.J. No. XXXX
Information No. 4813-05

Ontario Court of Justice
Brampton, Ontario
K.L. McDonald J.

Oral judgment: November XX, XXXX.
(49 paras.)
Charges: Impersonate peace officer False Defamatory, libel Convey False Message
Counsel:
R. Rotter Counsel for the Provincial Crown
T. Pain Counsel for Ken Masters
________________________________________
K.L. McDonald J. (orally):—
¶ 1 MS. ROTTER: The next matter, lines 80 to 82, Ken Masters.
¶ 2 MR. PAIN: ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. Camero Silver | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:


ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.

CAMERO SILVER

*************************

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

*************************

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE XXXX
On February xx, 20xx, at XXXX, Ontario

*************************

APPEARANCES:
XXXX Counsel for the Crown
T. Pain Counsel for Camero Silver

The Court (Orally):
Okay. I have my judgment in this matter. Given the relative brevity of the trial and the fact that the evidence and your submissions are very fresh in my mind, and the fact that it is twenty-five after four, I will endeavour to set ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. A.A. (cross-examination of trial lawyer) | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

B E T W E E N:

A.A.

-and-

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

* * * * * * * * * * * *

CROSS-EXAMINATION OF F. R.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Before THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BEAULIEU, at 361 University Ave., C.R. 4-9, Toronto, on the 16th day of May, 2002.

APPEARANCES:

Mr. D. Vandenberg –for the Crown
Mr. T. K. Pain –for the Appellant

Proceedings- May 16, 2002

Thursday, May 16, 2002

– Upon commencing at 10:43 a.m.

MR. ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. W.Z. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
v.
WILLY ZANE
**********

HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PROSE
**********

PROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL

**********

S. BURKE, ESQ. — For the Crown
T. PAIN, ESQ. — For the Accused

THE COURT: All right, then, the matter of Willy Zane, you are prepared to proceed? MR. BURKE: Yes.
THE COURT: Counsel is prepared to proceed?
MR. PAIN: Yes.
THE COURT: Counsel’s name for the record?
MR. PAIN: It’s “Pain,” Your Honour. It’s spelled P-A-I-N; first ...

Continue Reading →
0
Page 1 of 6 12345...»