Archive for 'Cases'

R. v. K.M. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Case Name:
R. v. Masters

Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Ken M. Masters

[2005] O.J. No. XXXX
Information No. 4813-05

Ontario Court of Justice
Brampton, Ontario
K.L. McDonald J.

Oral judgment: November XX, XXXX.
(49 paras.)
Charges: Impersonate peace officer False Defamatory, libel Convey False Message
Counsel:
R. Rotter Counsel for the Provincial Crown
T. Pain Counsel for Ken Masters
________________________________________
K.L. McDonald J. (orally):—
¶ 1 MS. ROTTER: The next matter, lines 80 to 82, Ken Masters.
¶ 2 MR. PAIN: ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. Camero Silver | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:


ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.

CAMERO SILVER

*************************

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

*************************

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE XXXX
On February xx, 20xx, at XXXX, Ontario

*************************

APPEARANCES:
XXXX Counsel for the Crown
T. Pain Counsel for Camero Silver

The Court (Orally):
Okay. I have my judgment in this matter. Given the relative brevity of the trial and the fact that the evidence and your submissions are very fresh in my mind, and the fact that it is twenty-five after four, I will endeavour to set ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. A.A. (cross-examination of trial lawyer) | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

B E T W E E N:

A.A.

-and-

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

* * * * * * * * * * * *

CROSS-EXAMINATION OF F. R.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Before THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BEAULIEU, at 361 University Ave., C.R. 4-9, Toronto, on the 16th day of May, 2002.

APPEARANCES:

Mr. D. Vandenberg –for the Crown
Mr. T. K. Pain –for the Appellant

Proceedings- May 16, 2002

Thursday, May 16, 2002

— Upon commencing at 10:43 a.m.

MR. ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. W.Z. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
v.
WILLY ZANE
**********

HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PROSE
**********

PROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL

**********

S. BURKE, ESQ. — For the Crown
T. PAIN, ESQ. — For the Accused

THE COURT: All right, then, the matter of Willy Zane, you are prepared to proceed? MR. BURKE: Yes.
THE COURT: Counsel is prepared to proceed?
MR. PAIN: Yes.
THE COURT: Counsel’s name for the record?
MR. PAIN: It’s “Pain,” Your Honour. It’s spelled P-A-I-N; first ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. J.L. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:


ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

V.

JERRY LAURIE

* * * * * *

PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE F. LOKOWSKI
on, February 28, 2007 at Newmarket, Ontario

*******
CHARGES: Assault x2

APPEARANCES:
B. McAdams Counsel for the Crown
T. Pain Counsel for the accused

* * * * *

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2007
MR. MCADAMS: And then we have the matter of Jerry Laurie.
THE COURT: Is that person here?
MR. PAIN: Good morning, Your Honour.
THE COURT: Come forward, sir.
MR. PAIN: ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. G.S. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

V.

G.S.
*********************

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE REBECCA SHAMAI
ON JULY 21, 2004, at Toronto.
*****************************

CHARGES: ASSAULT
*****************

APPEARANCES:
COUNSEL FOR THE CROWN: MS. H. KEATING
COUNSEL FOR THE ACCUSED: TUSHAR K. PAIN
****************************************

THE COURT: I am dismissing the charge. The Crown alleges that Ms. Watts was assaulted by George Sheppard, on the night of December 27th, 2002 at about 11:30 at night. The incident was witnessed by an off-duty officer who was ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. S.D. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.

S. D.

************

RULING ON 11(b)

CHARTER APPLICATION

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE W.ROSS
on October 27, 2004, at TORONTO, Ontario

************

APPEARANCES:

P. Benayon Counsel for the Crown
T. K. Pain Counsel for the accused

REASONS FOR RULING

ROSS, J (Orally): One aspect which the Court is mandated to consider is prejudice.

In the case of Her Majesty v. Atkinson,–it went to the Supreme Court of Canada, and it is an unreported case—His Lordship spelled out very clearly much of what has ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. A.R. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Case Name:
R. v. Rambo

Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Alonzo Rambo and Felice Mambo

[2005] O.J. No. 3434

Ontario Court of Justice
Toronto, Ontario
M. Omatsu J.

Oral judgment: April 20, 2005.
(116 paras.)
Counsel:
Ms. E. Winocur Counsel for the Crown
T. Pain, Esq. Counsel for the Accused

M. OMATSU J. (orally):—
1 MS. WINOCUR: Good morning, Your Honour.
2 THE COURT: Good morning.
3 MS. WINOCUR: My name is Erin Winocur. I appear for the Provincial Crown. Your Honour, I’m ...

Continue Reading →
0

R. v. Steven Johns | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

 

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

v.

STEVEN JOHNS

**********

J U D G M E N T

**********

BEFORE HIS HONOUR JUSTICE P. B.
On January 28, 2008,
At NEWMARKET, Ontario

**********

CHARGES: s. 249 (1) (a) C.C. – Dangerous Operation Vehicle

**********

APPEARANCES:

C. Raines Counsel for the Crown

T. Pain Counsel for Steven Johns

Monday, January 28, 2008

JUDGMENT

Justice B., P. (Orally):

On June 15th, 2007, the defendant, Steven Johns, was operating his motor vehicle eastbound on Belleview Side Road. The day was sunny and clear.

Officer Dale was operating an unmarked ...

Continue Reading →
0

R v. S.S. | Examples Of Favourable Verdicts

Posted by:

Case Name:
R. v. S.S.

Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
S.S.

[2003] O.J. No. 4736

Ontario Court of Justice
Newmarket, Ontario
Vaillancourt J.

Oral judgment: June 24, 2003.
(5 paras.)

Charges: Impaired & Over 80

Counsel:
C. Chorney, for the Crown.
T.K. Pain, for the defendant.

 

¶ 1      VAILLANCOURT J. (orally):— I agree with the defence that when we are coming to certificates and when we come to evidence, especially when the officer is indicating that he specifically reviewed the documents to check the spelling and ...

Continue Reading →
0
Page 2 of 6 12345...»